Demand for Australian carbon credit units (ACCUs) gives an indication of the likely volume and timing of ACCUs required to be supplied to the market. Emissions Reduction Fund contracts are the largest source of demand with 10.2 million ACCUs delivered in 2018–19. However, additional sources of demand are emerging from the voluntary market, state and territory governments and the safeguard mechanism.
Demand for ACCUs in 2017–18 and 2019–20 (as at 30 September 2019) by source
Demand Source | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 (to date) |
---|
Emissions Reduction Fund contracts | 10.92 million | 10.17 million | 4.27 million |
Safeguard mechanism
* | 0.38 million | 0.15 million | - |
State and territory government demand | 0.21 million | 0.07 million | 0.02 million |
Voluntary demand | 0.14 million | 0.32 million | 0.11 million |
*Safeguard mechanism surrender does not include deemed surrenders.
Emissions Reduction Fund contracts
The Clean Energy Regulator has committed $2.3 billion to date through Commonwealth government contracts to purchase 192 million ACCUs. Over $230 million remains available from the Emissions Reduction Fund for future purchasing.
Of the 192 million ACCUs required under Emissions Reduction Fund contracts, 47.3 million ACCUs have been delivered to date, with 144.9 million ACCUs remaining to be delivered by 2029–30.
Scheduled demand from Emissions Reduction Fund contracts is rising each year, with the 10.2 million ACCUs delivered in 2018–19 increasing to reach 20.8 million ACCUs required in 2021–22.
Emission Reduction Fund contracts demand data
Emissions Reduction Fund contract demand data is provided in the
carbon abatement contract register. The register provides information on the carbon abatement contracts awarded by the Clean Energy Regulator, the total number of ACCUs purchased by the Commonwealth each financial year, contract duration, end date, and status, and whether a contract was established with one or more conditions precedent.
Conditions precedent is a condition that must be fulfilled or waived before the obligation to deliver and purchase ACCUs under the contract comes into effect.
The table below shows the deliveries made to date, and the remaining scheduled deliveries for Emissions Reduction Fund contracts. Scheduled deliveries can change over time due to early delivery of ACCUs, re-scheduled deliveries, contract terminations and new contracts.
Contract deliveries made and remaining scheduled deliveries of ACCUs
Financial year | ERF contract deliveries (millions) | Remaining ERF scheduled deliveries (millions) |
---|
2014-15 and 2015-16 | 8.6 | - |
2016-17- | 13.3 | - |
2017-18 | 10.9 | - |
2018-19 | 10.2
| -
|
2019-20 | 4.3
| 14.3
|
2020-21 | - | 17.6
|
2021-22 | - | 20.8
|
2022-23 | - | 16.7
|
2023-24 | - | 17.4
|
2024-25 | - | 17.3
|
2025-26 | - | 17.5
|
2026-27 | - | 12.2 |
2027-28 | - | 8.3 |
2028-29 | - | 2.1
|
2029-30 | - | 0.7
|
Non-commonwealth demand
Private and state and territory demand is growing with an eight per cent increase in ACCU demand in 2018–19 compared to 2017-18. Sources of demand include state and territory governments, state-owned corporations and voluntary corporate participants—including National Carbon Offset Standard/Carbon Neutral Program participants. There is also demand under the Safeguard mechanism.
Emerging demand for ACCUs
Source: Clean Energy Regulator. *Demand for 2019-20 includes voluntary demand and State and Territory Governement demand as a 30 September 2019.
Safeguard mechanism demand
The safeguard mechanism is a regulatory source of demand. There are a number of options available to responsible emitters to
manage their emissions below their baseline, and comply with their obligations including applications for multi-year monitoring periods, calculated baselines and emissions intensity variations as well as sourcing and surrendering ACCUs.
Multi-year monitoring periods allow a facility to exceed its baseline in one year, as long as the net average emissions over two or three years are below the baseline. If a facility’s net average emissions still causes them to be in an excess emissions situation at the end of the multi-year monitoring period, the responsible emitter may source and surrender ACCUs as a management option. A list of all responsible emitters with multi-year monitoring periods is provided on the
safeguard baselines table.
There was 100 per cent compliance for the 2016–17 and 2017–18 compliance years, meaning all facilities were are or below their baseline by the 1 March deadline. Responsible emitters from the manufacturing, mining, oil and gas and transport industry sectors chose to manage their emissions by sourcing and surrendering 379,792 ACCUs by 28 February 2018 and 151,307 ACCUs by 28 February 2019. A proportion of ACCUs surrendered were non-Kyoto units but the future supply of these units is constrained due to international rules.
We recommend planning how to source sufficient ACCUs, as ACCU prices will vary depending on a number of factors including the timing of purchase, the volume required and any third party contractual agreements that may be in place.
Source: Clean Energy Regulator.
Safeguard mechanism demand data
Safeguard demand data is provided in the
2016–17 safeguard facility emissions table and
2017–18 safeguard facility emissions table. The tables include the responsible emitter name, facility name, state/territory of operation and the volumes of ACCUs surrendered for each compliance year. This table also includes which facilities have multi-year monitoring in place. This data is published in March each year.
The safeguard baselines table includes facilities that have been issued a baseline determination under the safeguard mechanism.
Voluntary demand
Voluntary demand for ACCUs is mainly for offsetting emissions for airlines and corporate entities. These organisations may require offsets for certification under the Department of the Environment and Energy’s
National Carbon Offset Scheme.
Buyers from this demand source are often interested in the co-benefits associated with the underlying projects. For example, savanna fire management projects may support employment in indigenous and rural communities, and vegetation projects may have complementary biodiversity benefits.
Voluntary demand for ACCUs is increasing, rising from 25,000 ACCUs in 2014-15 to over 300,000 ACCUs in 2018-19. Approximately 110,000 ACCUs have already been cancelled in 2019-20 to date.
State and territory government demand
State and territory government demand for ACCUs is an emerging source of demand and is mainly to meet government commitments or policies to offset emissions. Examples include offsets for emissions associated with the operation of some desalination plants in Australia and vehicle fleet emissions.
Buyers from this demand source are also interested in the co-benefits associated with the underlying projects and in offsets achieved within their jurisdictions.
State and territory government demand for ACCUs was over 65,000 ACCUs in 2018-19.
Voluntary and state and territory government demand data
Voluntary and state and territory demand data is provided in the
voluntary cancellations table. The data includes the date of transaction, the entity name and the number and type of units including non-Kyoto and Kyoto units.